Contact

Questions about specific content on this site, corrections to cited data, or requests for topic coverage not yet addressed — this page explains how those reach the editorial team, what happens next, and what kinds of inquiries are handled here versus elsewhere.

Response expectations

The editorial team reviews incoming messages on a rolling basis, with a typical first response issued within 3 to 5 business days. That window reflects the volume of reader submissions across a reference property of this scope — not indifference.

A few things that move faster: factual correction requests citing a specific named source. If a reader identifies a statistic that has been superseded, a regulatory figure that has changed, or a broken citation, those are flagged for same-week review. Precision is the whole point of reference content, and errors in nutrient thresholds or policy figures aren't the kind of thing that sits in a queue.

A few things that take longer: detailed topic requests that require original research synthesis. A request like "can you cover renal diet protein limits in more depth" might take 2 to 3 weeks if it involves cross-referencing clinical dietary guidelines, National Kidney Foundation recommendations, and FDA labeling standards before new content goes live.

What this office does not provide, under any circumstances, is personalized dietary advice, meal planning, or clinical guidance. That distinction matters enormously. The difference between a reference resource and a medical consultation isn't just a legal formality — it's the difference between general evidence on, say, vitamin D supplementation thresholds and a recommendation for a specific individual's dosage based on bloodwork. The former lives here. The latter belongs with a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist or a physician.

Additional contact options

Three categories of inquiry are handled through structured channels rather than general email:

  1. Factual corrections and citation disputes — Flag the specific page URL, the claim in question, and the source that contradicts it. Corrections that include a direct link to the superseding document (a USDA publication, an NIH Office of Dietary Supplements fact sheet, an updated FDA labeling rule) are processed faster than those that do not.

  2. Content gap requests — If a topic covered in the nutrition and diet topic overview is missing a dedicated page, or if a dietary pattern, supplement, or life-stage consideration isn't addressed, those requests go into the editorial calendar. High-specificity requests (naming a particular nutrient, condition, or population group) are prioritized over broad suggestions.

  3. Partnership and licensing inquiries — Organizations seeking to license reference content, establish co-citation relationships, or discuss editorial collaboration reach a different review process than reader correspondence. These are evaluated quarterly.

General questions about how content is structured — including how evidence hierarchies are applied to nutrition research — are addressed in the nutrition research and evidence hierarchy section.

How to reach this office

Correspondence reaches the editorial team through the contact form on this page. No account creation is required. For written inquiries sent without using the form, the address is verified in the site footer.

When submitting a correction or topic request, include:

Messages that arrive without any of these specifics aren't discarded, but they do take longer to act on. A message that reads "I think something is wrong about the fiber recommendations" requires a follow-up exchange to locate the issue. A message that cites the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025 and names the specific recommendation being disputed goes straight to a content reviewer.

Service area covered

This reference property covers nutrition and dietary topics within a national United States scope. Content reflects federal dietary guidance — including USDA MyPlate standards, FDA food labeling regulations, and NIH Office of Dietary Supplements guidance — alongside peer-reviewed research from sources including the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

State-specific nutrition assistance program rules (beyond federal SNAP eligibility and nutrition standards) are outside this property's editorial scope. Readers with questions specific to a single state's WIC guidelines, Medicaid nutrition therapy coverage, or school nutrition implementation should contact that state's Department of Health or Department of Agriculture directly.

International dietary guidelines — those published by the European Food Safety Authority, Health Canada, or the World Health Organization — appear in this content only when they inform the comparative analysis of a topic, not as primary guidance. The primary frame here is the US regulatory and clinical environment.

Topics that span multiple life stages, chronic disease categories, and population groups are organized across the site's full topic architecture. The how-to-get-help section is the right starting point for readers trying to navigate toward clinical or community resources rather than reference content.

Report a Data Error or Correction

Found incorrect information, an outdated fact, or a broken link? Use the form below.

References